EPISTEMOLOGY IN CRISIS PART 1 – UNBECOMING SCIENTISM

“The time will come when diligent research over long periods will bring to light things which now lie hidden. A single lifetime, even though entirely devoted to the sky, would not be enough for the investigation of so vast a subject. And so this knowledge will be unfolded only through long successive ages. There will come a time when our descendants will be amazed that we did not know things that are so plain to them. Many discoveries are reserved for ages still to come, when memory of us will have been effaced.”
– Seneca

There are more people working as scientists today than at any other time in history, the growth has been exponential with major innovation predicted as a result (Price 1961). However, genuine innovation per scientist, despite the earlier predictions, has been slowing down (Gold 2021) to a rate approximating pre-enlightenment periods (Adler 2005). It has been argued this is an artefact of escalating complexity, however many newer academic fields merely contribute to the chorus of confusion, without helping untangle complexity. These new fields exist to increase complexity, challenge perfectly reasonable reductionist instruments, and cause confusion through baseless appeals to emotional irrationality. Some of them exist to appease those poorly equipped for the endeavour of sciences, instead of helping them do better.

Most of all, however, it is because scientists are no longer first trained as philosophers. That many scientists will have taken one introduction to philosophy course undermines the very foundation of education for scientific pursuits. Reliability in social sciences are at an all time low (Enserink 2018). Meanwhile, some have proclaimed a “golden age” of social sciences due to innovations in computing and the amount of data available (Buyalskaya 2021). This presumes that the social sciences are on the right track while replicability has been heavily criticised in social sciences, as late (Enserink 2018). I do not see this as so much a problem of practice, as it is symptomatic of much larger issues in science and education.

POLITICS OF THEORY

Humans seek acceptance from peers because it feels good. This is a large part of what drives innovative scientists to perform. However, with a decrease in the average intelligence of a group, say post-graduates, mere popular acceptance of theory can easily become the presiding factor. Perfectly legitimate theories languish with no attention while absurd theories receive renown and recognition. Often this is based on little more than the charisma of the scientist, or the social influence of their professional network.

WORKINGS OF SCIENTISM

It is simple to trick educated people into believing nonsense, so long as the plot is “sound” and fits the modelled presentation of “accepted” theories. Modern graduate school curriculums in sciences are geared toward simple presentation of methodologies, writing skills, field history, and theory applications. These are scientistic finishing schools. While valuable for transference of useful skills for the crafts in a particular science, it cannot boost the number of legitimate scientists who ask the questions they should be asking.

Sciences today have become cathedrals of careers. A theory may become a standard spire of the cathedral simply on account of being politically disadvantageous to deny and politically advantageous to affirm or affirm fervently. Investigations informed by celebrated theories are preconditioned toward complimentary results, which necessarily reduce the discovery rate of anomalies, e.g. confounding factors and contradicting data. This is a primary source for the decrease in innovation, yet unrecognised because it is the desired corporate-academic environment. The corporations must dictate acceptable opinions in corporatism (Roe 2023a; 2023b).

THEORETICAL PROBLEMS

Scientistic confederacies often form to “solve theoretical problems.” Typically, the true goal is to divert attention away from and subvert investigation of any phenomena unexplained by a theory. Often the ancillary theories, or theory alterations designed to “solve theoretical problems,” become fully accepted with little debate, because there is little else to do. The theories cannot be overturned, there are too many careers and lies at risk. There is a high degree of willingness to suspend disbelief afforded by the sheer popularity of a guarded primary theory, or simply the gravity afforded them with age, matching the pain of punishment reserved for any heterodoxy. This willingness strengthens with the accrual of theories based on the primary one, and this tower on the cathedral grows.

Another scientistic strategy for diversion away from theoretical weaknesses is the placement of false theorists. These serve to either draw attention away from legitimate avenues of research or generate bad attention by association with the ridiculous. This is done not only to protect favoured theories but also political positions and topics considered controversial. Unfortunately, these bad theories often find too large of an audience due to their legitimisation by promotion through corporatist media outlets.

BUSINESS AND SCIENCE

Once profit-focused people are involved in the healthcare industry, instead of healers and health scientists alone, focus shifts away from healing toward profit (Roe 2023b). This is especially true in leadership. Certain business rules, if applied as guidance in evaluating sciences of healing, are disastrous for medicine (Roe 2023b). Malevolent people can easily utilise business conventions and “the bottomline” to force deadly practices internally while hiding behind the sheen of medicine to promote themselves as heroes.

There are identical dangers and risks of bad practices throughout the scientific fields with the introduction of business concerns (Roe 2023a). Every industry must have its own currency of knowledge, based in the underlying science. The same is true of science itself. Philosophy is the undergirding of science, essentially the science behind science.

Bad actors exist, and the most dangerous are those able to remain silent as they do their damage. This is especially true where the ulterior political benefits are perceived as outweighing all possible costs, whatever those perceptions might be. This is easily imaginable in regards to healthcare.

In corporatist business, the purpose is to destroy the competition. This is the antipathy of science. It is a nightmare of many that sciences should be dictated by corporate manipulation of public opinion through ignorant emotion, but it is already reality.

BUSINESS AND SCIENCE

Scientism is rampant across the human dialectic. The problems mount and appear to be worsening. All sciences must be refactored in bases back to proper philosophical alignment, but how is this to be done? Realignment is possible by placing scientific innovation, or new knowledge, in its proper place within the mind as informed by a given tradition or culture, and then deriving a more reasoned foundation of knowledge from that comprehension. This is especially true for sciences that pretend to have a simplified grasp upon the past, such as astronomy, geology, history, or archaeology. Biases are not only expected in these fields, they are native and fundamental to the outcome. To ignore this fact is dishonest. As such this requires a new epistemology.

REFERENCES

Adler, R. (2005). Entering a dark age of innovation. New Scientist.

Buyalskaya, A., Gallo, M., & Camerer, C. F. (2021). The golden age of social science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(5), e2002923118. doi:10.1073/pnas.2002923118.

Gold, E. R. (2021). The fall of the innovation empire and its possible rise through open science. Research Policy, 50(5), 104226.

Enserink, M. (2018). “Research on research”. Science. 361: 1178–1179. doi:10.1126/science.361.6408.1178.

Price, D. J. S. (1961). Science Since Babylon. Yale University Press.

EPISTEMOLOGY IN CRISIS PART 2 – PHILOSOPHIC BECOMING

“Thus the man, in himself, is the child. And what the child has to do is to rise out of this abstract and undeveloped ‘in-himself’ and become ‘for himself’ what he is at first only ‘in-himself’ – a free and reasonable being.”
– Hegel

Knowledge & Experience

The primary problem in science remains the underlying separation between knowledge and experience. Many scholars point to the Cartesian divide as being determinative in that separation. However, the societal arrangement of court intellectualism predates the philosophical distinctions he made, so Descartes is exonerated even if his ideas are used to justify modern scientistic practices. Some have even attempted to solve the problem with more scientism, creating so-called “metascience,” which is an exciting new way of avoiding the “ph” word (Enserink 2018). Metascience to philosophy is psychiatry to psychology, needless to say it belongs under philosophy. However, in practice its separation from philosophy is obvious by the scientistic negotiating and finagling inherent. If the divide between knowledge and experience can be bridged then, theoretically, that would be a solution and formation of a new epistemology.

SILOS OF INFORMATION

While the confusion has insinuated itself into additional territory of scientific categories more recently, it was definitely ever-present among sciences that relied upon notions of history, since their beginning. This is less a function of modernity or philosophy than a never-ending supply of money, and therefore corruption. Corporations and associated foundations purposefully encourage divisions between the sciences, forming silos of information. The basic misinterpretation of Descartes helps justify the division of scientists from their inherent responsibilities. Is it enough simply to be capable of thought and have any desires, to engage in science?

The more egregious result of the Cartesian misinterpretation is the lie that a thought and a person can be equally objectively defined, with the only necessities being current action and “pertinent” facts, like a recipe. If this were true, then there would be no need for discourse and everything could be obviously transcribed in simple and objective language without need for expansive commentary. Nobody would have come up with a term like “metascience,” that is for certain. It is not true that a person and a thought can be equally defined, however. Therefore discourse and underlying philosophies are here to guard against corruption.

SUM

Cogito, ergo sum is an unfortunate combination for some translations. Descartes never implied that all thoughts were equal due to substantiation of being. He never intended simply being, sum, to qualify thought. His primary implication was that a person cannot doubt their own being at the asking of the question since the very doubt disproves its own thesis. “I doubt I am, therefore I am,” or dubito sum, ergo sum.

Descartes was concerned with a proof of reality in the face of philosophical complexity. He formulated the concept in a theoretically finite present to confront a particular problem of philosophic existence with the conscious asking being proof. No doubt, he inferred from the problem that anybody who arrived at the question of their own existence would do so only after extensive thought. He never intended for perceived incongruence to be interpreted as an invitation for the entry of the non-philosophical into the sciences. He probably never presumed it would be necessary. “We cannot doubt our existence while we doubt,” can not be used to undermine the journey a thinker must take in order to arrive at that doubt.

Perhaps the greatest damage from the misinterpretation of the concept has come from the assignment of being, sum, in a singular moment of thinking, or a micro-phase of becoming. In fact, had Descartes not considered preceding thoughts necessary to his grand conception, he would not have conceived it in terms of his own self, “I,” ironically. The misconception of his phrase, however, models general human behaviour. This is proved by the historical compression of a life that occurs after death, where a moment, misinterpreted or not, is taken as expressing the total essence of an individual.

“We cannot doubt our existence while we doubt,” can not be used to undermine the journey a thinker must take in order to arrive at that doubt.

I REFLECT, THEREFORE I AM

Descartes’s Latin phrase implies an infinite loop of thought, not a singular thought, as in cogitavi. Any individual action, regardless, cannot be presumed to perpetually qualify the finite being, sum. Cogito derives from a root meaning “to do with,” and might be better translated as “I reflect,” as almost a profession. Extracting a pithy foundation for knowledge from Descartes into English begins with comprehending this thought action.

In fact, thought cannot be a singular action, as a singular thought is impossible outside of a person’s very first thought. Since thought is an action of a dynamic faculty, its persistence cannot contribute to what exists without changing it, and every thought must change other thoughts. Thought cannot make anything identical in the present to what was in the past, let alone itself. Therefore an infinite progress of related states in time toward an undefined future end is referred to together as becoming.

With cogito, ergo sum came the implication of conglomerative being states in historical series, with each mental moment inclusive of previous moments. There can be a more exact statement with cogito ergo fieri, “I reflect therefore become.” In Resurrexit phenomenology, the consciousness is an accumulative complex entity that cannot be summarised into a moment (Roe 2023a).

IMMANENT ETERNAL REBIRTHS

Every moment of mind births the next, endlessly. So all past moments leave birthmarks of sorts upon proceeding ones. These marks upon the procession in moments of mind constitute the existence of the consciousness, it is the state. Of these marks through time constituting self, the elements most distinctively self are always the most original or habited. These indicate the immanent endeavours most striven toward. These endeavours make a fingerprint shaped through environment by the basic nature of the matured Spirit. Consciousness attempts an inclusion of all moments, or everything pertinent to a matter, including an image of self as most accurate reflection of Spirit. The thinker does not just make thoughts, but is made in the construction of those thoughts most true to the Spirit.

The “I” is a permanently present eternal now without direct indication to past. Thus this universalised self-reference in the language of Descartes can only be resolved by replacing first-person action, “I,” with an objective-subjective figure, who, having had thoughts, continues to have thoughts, becoming closer to the actual Spirit. This figure must be professional, yet simple enough to be specific at the same time as universal: Thinker.

If substance of thought prove existence then quality of matured thoughts prove the essence of Spirit, which is to say its proximity to universals. Since all thoughts are acts of becoming, the quality of the thoughts determine the becoming and provide the evidence for the types of those thoughts. Good thoughts improve the quality of thought, with better thoughts doing all the more cyclically. Bad thoughts ruin quality of thought. It stands to Reason: the Thinker Becomes.

COGITATORIS ERIT

Cogitatoris Erit means “the Thinker Becomes.” This is more appropriate for a foundation of knowledge in association with the phenomenology of Resurrexit Theory (Roe 2023b). Thought alone is meaningless without the perseverance of a thinker, a factor hidden by the anonymous reference to self, “I.” The thinker acting toward becoming, accumulating thoughts, is a much more robust confirmation of existence: “a thinker exists,” for what? “To become the quality of thoughts.” Descartes never intended to disqualify the quality in thought or the thinker. The only reliable proof of quality thought is progress, attendant behaviours evidencing a higher existence.

SELF DESTRUCTION

Attempting to extract the self is an inherently flawed and foolhardy venture that ALWAYS fails. Not even a theoretically “perfect” person can do this. Only a system bent on the demise of culture could expect this of a person. Elements of culture that are beneficial to human organisation are necessarily bad for corporatism: true human science, human philosophy, and legitimately liberating innovations. Corporatist sciences inevitably devolve into anti-science ventures with destructive ends. The corporate-approved scientism insists on impossible ideas. This is science dominated by corporations using the emotions of the population, as seen now.

The “thinker becoming” attends the valuable notion that a person must philosophically explore the self before being capable of contributing to the human dialectic in a meaningful way. Thought regarding existence alone may validate it, but value is determined by quality of thoughts, which is derived from the character of Spirit developed through birth, rearing, culture, thought, and experience. This is all validated by progressive behaviours.

SO-CALLED NON-BIAS

Using ‘thinker’ instead of the simple actions of thought refuses the notion of non-bias from science. It incorporates the action with its own profession. The action makes the subject, and so the subject is made explicit. In other words, the performance of science without the self and bias is impossible, and anybody that claims otherwise is a liar. An individual with biases alternative to the continuation of their own society, culture, and life, is not moral nor ethical and cannot be trusted, with science or otherwise. They cannot be entrusted with their own culture or those of others. This is proved by their own illogical and materialist behaviours. Therefore, the Thinker Becomes.

THINKERS ARE BECOMERS

This means the only opinions that matter in science are those of thinkers who have proven active “becomers,” signifying progressive and quality thoughts. Such philosopher-scientists are in constant stages of self-improvement. Behaviours are the only evidence possible for proving right-thinking. Scientists who do not demonstrate morality and ethical behaviour in Reasoned moderation are philosophically undeveloped. This inhibits judgement through necessarily warped perspectives of the self in relation to the World.

SCIENTISTIC INSTRUMENTS AND GENOCIDE

This false self-denial forces the subconscious into active misalignment, because this denial of the self is an internalised slavery. This can cause psychotic notions and delusions. This internalised serfdom cripples efforts of the Spirit. A person who cannot be honest about the self and recognise excellence, cannot demonstrate virtues and is predisposed to materialism and error (Roe 2023b). A lot of this stems from envying undeserving others, or corruption, perceived or otherwise. This is based on an egoistic fear built on conceit, which is instigated by lust and causes confusion. This drives ignorant and lustful sloth, which manifests as venal dependence and greed. These give licence to delusion, where ignorance and confusion allow for their enslavement to a warped, immature, and arbitrary subconscious.

This delusive error corrupts perceptions of things above and below for the person. The notions of others and law are obscured as nothing more than instruments at their disposal. The joining of ignorance and confusion is a blindness to all but a corrupted egoism and self-importance. A perfect example of this is an ignorant person who does not take care of progeny and then lives by committing crimes. Each of these crimes further potentialise the immanent materiality of corruption, procrastination, absolutism, and cowardice. When in prison, thoughts are turned away from responsibility, toward blame. Attempts to identify the individual self in universal terms outside of the compatible and progressive particular, amid the active delusions of self, fail as basically unnatural propositions.

Another example of such blindness are those wholly bereft of culture who believe personal enjoyment is the sum of reality. These hedonists appease inner emptiness by pretending to some corrupted and loose ideas of society that look nothing like genuine human community. They justify their actions internally by the level of corruption in society. This process is always active for those positioned as societal outsiders, or so alienated. This explains mindsets involved in the COVID-19 plandemic, which may qualify as the largest genocide in history.

SUMMARY

Science is failing but how can this be elaborated upon for the purposes of repair? The answers for science should always start from bases. Structure for science already exists in philosophy, but philosophy is pointless without knowledge, which is supposed to be science. So rather than some entity unto itself, science should be seen as an arm of philosophy. If science is an arm of philosophy then the purpose of science is to improve the potential of philosophy. This is why it is a necessity for scientists to be philosophers first and foremost. Meanwhile most scientists will have taken no more than one class in philosophy throughout their entire education.

All corporatist-aligned institutions are detrimental to honest scientific inquiry. Runaway profits in medicine and science funding are about as normal as academia being funded by corporate foundations. These are to be recognised as signs of corruption and the exploitation of flaws within the overall system. For example, the blatant profiteering involved with the mRNA injections, wherein the only recipients of any longterm immunity were the pharmaceutical giants. The next article reveals the corporatist plot to destroy all alternative foundations for human organisation and why that matters to science.

REFERENCES

Enserink, M. (2018). “Research on research”. Science. 361: 1178–1179. doi:10.1126/science.361.6408.1178.

Roe, M. A. (2023a). Resurrexit Spiritus part 3 – Resurrexit Theory – The Dualist Expansion of Structural Phenomenology. 24K Journal of Virtues Science. Resurrexit Spiritus: Spiritual Phenomenology, Evolution of Spirit, First Other Theory of Fatherhood Attachment, and Structural Virtues System

Roe, M. A. (2023b). Dialectic Mind – Resurrexit Spiritus part 4. 24K Journal of Virtues Science. Resurrexit Spiritus: Spiritual Phenomenology, Evolution of Spirit, First Other Theory of Fatherhood Attachment, and Structural Virtues System

UNDOING MATERIALISM – EPISTEMOLOGY IN CRISIS PART 3

previous articles in series:
https://24K.cc/article/epistemologycrisis1/
https://24K.cc/article/epistemologycrisis2/

“If a man has lost a leg or an eye, he knows he has lost a leg or an eye; but if he has lost a self–himself–he cannot know it, because he is no longer there to know it.”
– Oliver Sacks, The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat and Other Clinical Tales

Truth is difficult to ascertain with active flooding of lies. These are lies because while some may believe them, they are not mistakes and are purposeful. It is never a mistake when they are being funded by the corporations and their foundations. These corporations do not make purposefully “bad” investments. The point is to obscure the truth by shifting attentions off of corporatism and on to things oppositional to corporatism, so that the natural forces of human criticism against power are redirected. Understanding falsehood is necessary before attaining to truth, yet so few scientists are philosophers first. Nobody second guesses the process. Complete the degree and then sign up for a sedative paycheque to perform work to benefit a faceless fictional entity called stock.

HOW CORPORATIONS RUINED SCIENCE

The propaganda in academia is funded by corporate “benefactors.” “Critical Theory” is hypercritical against all areas of human culture, or empowerment. This fraud ideology contains no love, but is a simple devotion to novelty alone that merely “liberates” people from their traditions and culture, by its own admission. In fact, it is hatred for anything non-novel. It appears in the guise of “anti-establishment” discourse by being anti-everything that is not absolutely pro-novelty. For instance, the media and academia were not for the novelty of ivermectin as a potential treatment against COVID-19, because their preferred novelty of the hour was the murderous mRNA injections posing as vaccines. They launched a literal propaganda war against ivermectin that continues to this day, when it turned out to be one of the best treatments available (Wells 2023). So it is not a bias toward novelty generally, but specifically the most destructive, which is to say pro-corporation, novelty.

DEMORALISATION

This is a part of the much larger corporate project to demoralise their servant population (Roe 2023b). Turning the half of the population against the other is the aim, as the people have less ability to organise against the corporations. Half of the population is naturally more open to novelty but this is converted into an unreasonable devotion to novelty, in implementation. This new unnatural position renders them anathema for any parliamentary interactions. It is a debate with lunatics, essentially. The novelty imposing extreme is fully funded. The half of the population seeking to conserve elements of culture are not allowed to speak on corporate platforms, of course. Government bodies have been thus turned into corporate instruments for cultural destruction, or deculturation.

FALSE LIBERALISM

This false appropriation of liberalism is a total inversion of that natural novelty-seeking in humans, evolutionarily selected for in its tendency to provoke curiosity. Any group of “modern liberal” researchers, insofar as they are incapable of love for their own traditions, fail to embody a complete humanity, in their abject individualised alienation (Roe 2024a). This is because they are invalid candidates for legitimate universalising, incapable of determining healthy values. Instead, such propagandised researchers are a destructive cancer on the social dialectic (Roe 2024b). A healthy dialectic in society entails sound philosophy as the underlying foundation. This is necessary for the promotion of values that secure the persistence of that society because the science is pointless if the underlying society that can use it disappears.

UNIVERSALISING

People genuinely wish to move toward honest universalism, which is to say proximity to God for many. People will not refuse a movement that proposes changes toward that universalism. However, they must embody a particular beyond the degree to which they wish to change it. Impact can only be minimal even with wide distribution, if the particular is not somehow exemplified. So conveyance of an adapted particular image will be greatly harmed in ability to convince by being too inconsistent. If no legitimate benefits to the particular image can be demonstrated, it can only be of neutral or destructive value.

There is basic corruption in modern understandings regarding the relationship of the universal with the particular. The universal is important to the particular, and the particular can be important to the universal, insofar as it models the universal. The universal is important to the individual but the individual, outside their fabric of particularity, is specifically unimportant in universal terms. The individual is of primary importance to their particular, this is because the individual can affect nothing but destruction outside of it. It bears repeating that outsiderness is supremely alienating. Anyone in emotional settings of alienation is predisposed to materiality and error, which is to say dishonesty and criminality. This is not a process that can be changed, and as former majorities turn into minorities, they too will feel more alienation.

ANTI-UNIVERSAL VERSUS UNIVERSAL

This is similar to the anti-universal particulars through which the most destructive individuals also affect the universal. Individuals only find constructive contribution to the universal within boundaries of their own functioning particular. Once an individual rejects the particular completely, they renounce their connection to the universal. The only option for achieving universality then is reattachment to a compatible and universalising particular.

ACHIEVEMENT THROUGH PARTICULARS

It is only through the particular led toward the universal that true universalism can be achieved. It is never an individual that is the particular, but the individual among other individuals in a society. Societies of people make up meaningful particulars that can culturally approach the universals. Any philosophy attempting the disruption of this natural relationship, aside from finding eventual correction, is aimed at the simple destruction of particulars. This destruction is especially egregious when directed at self-universalising particulars.

DESTRUCTIVE CRITIQUE

The damage done on the part of so-called “Critical Theory” is difficult to comprehend. “Criticality” drops off once a science has been “criticised” enough. Replace these words with whatever you like: destructiveness and deconstructed are personal preferences. The results are the same, however it is preferred, that a science becomes a coatrack. This criticality destroys a discourse and then it stops there, once particularly useless theories are implemented. It appears that the primary point of this “criticality” is to disarm elements of cohesion that can be used for organisation among workers. And so it is, Critical Theory does define all elements of tradition as part of the problem with “capitalism.” However the more that is destroyed in the social framework of society, the more “capitalistic” things become. That means Critical Theory is not doing its job.

By redirecting worker movements away from focus upon the ultra-wealthy and corporatist bankers at the heart of “capitalism,” Marx made sure these could never be successful. If they focused upon culture, it could only be damaging toward the workers and never the corporatists, because the corporations do not need any culture but that which they control. Of course, corporations work hard at deculturation. They use the deculturation weapon even now, directly against their servant workers as they also push divisive and demoralising propaganda.

The appropriate response to Critical Theory is criticism of critique, which is only possible through full ownership of the particular universality it seeks to destroy in science. All natural biases hence must be owned and embodied. Anything else is cowardice. Reason is seeking truth, not self-destruction nor vitriol against all things simply for being perceived as traditional. This looks exactly like a complete honesty in institution because it is. It involves rejecting any political motives incompatible with achieving freedom, which is to say allowing the Good to be truly Good (Roe 2023a).

It should be pointed out that the charter for Critical Theory is unending. This concept and its distillates in a thousand different fields and industries have wreaked havoc upon the sciences of the Western world. And for what? Has Western Civilisation been improved? Or are the innovations merely a fraction of the normal advances that could have come about? How much can be credited to the gatekeepers slowing down advances by undermining scientific investigations and condemning entire fields? Universalising, or moving toward truth, is the ultimate Good for humanity. The only bad bias then is bias against universals, which is to say biases that harm universalising particulars.

SPIRIT GUIDE

Summerling of Domains from Resurrexit Spiritus

The best that can be achieved in alleviating bad bias, i.e. bias destructive of universals, is through the elevation of the Spirit and its insistence upon universal principles. Any attempt at removing bias generally is impossible, besides its basic flaw in crippling the scientific process. The reaction will be decisive and can only make the bias worse, because individuals will always be inherently biased toward whatever is perceived as best, however bad that perception may be.

The conversation of Spirit typically turns around its loss to modern science, however the more egregious sin may be the less discussed and more original loss of truth and knowledge to Spirit. This is to say the real damage to science happened when Art, including those religious and cultural Arts, stopped being concerned about aligning with truth. Of course the sciences will be overrun by unspiritual people when a majority of spiritual philosophies people grow up with have long since given up on truth as a guideline, which is to say science. Science is now ‘secularised,’ which just means practitioners pretend to mind their ‘own business’ no matter the madness that prevails in religion. Unfortunately, this has also ostracised any philosophy outside of the modern so-called ‘humanism’ that attends secular philosophy.

To move toward universals is to dispossess the self, but it cannot be done alone, and must be done through the particular. The idea that optimal science is performed by a removal of bias is a master lie. It is a master lie for the damage that it inflicts. It causes so much damage because it has the lustre of truth, but it is not truth. The ejection of egoism is merely the aping of self-dispossession, however it is mimicry only. The quest for an artificial and non-universal neutrality, or forced “equality,” will ironically only create still greater imbalance.

Cogitatoris Erit, the Thinker Becomes, implies the spiritual growth that is universalising self-dispossession. True self-dispossession only comes at the expense of honest introspection and the development of virtues, in the dispensing of materiality and moving desires. Stepping through this barrier is impossible by any other means but the internal alignment toward Reason, universalisation (Roe 2023c). This is because self-dispossession is the grace apparent in the cultivation of virtues, which is to say Reason itself. A philosopher self-dispossess in order to assist in the universalising of the particular, because that is graceful Reason. There is no way to fake Reason, and being habitually critical of tradition is no shortcut but simple and stupid destruction for its own sake. The next article explores the corporatist origins of ‘Critical Theory’ through Marx’s consanguineous imperial paymasters.

REFERENCES

Roe, M. A. (2023a). Complete Freedom series. 24K Journal of Virtues Science. Complete Freedom part 1 – The Unicorn of Philosophy | Complete Freedom part 2 – A Philosophical Definition

Roe, M. A. (2023b). Corporations Promote Profitable Sins as Virtues series. 24K Journal of Virtues Science. Corporations Promote Profitable Sins as Virtues part 1 – Material Idealism | Corporations Promote Profitable Sins as Virtues part 2 – Delusions of Control

Roe, M. A. (2023c). Resurrexit Spiritus series. 24K Journal of Virtues Science. Resurrexit Spiritus: Spiritual Phenomenology, Evolution of Spirit, First Other Theory of Fatherhood Attachment, and Structural Virtues System

Roe, M. A. (2024a). Manteic Ontology and Theory of Mind series. 24K Journal of Virtues Science. To Be Published.

Roe, M. A. (2024b). Terminal Societal Cancer. 24K Journal of Virtues Science. To Be Published.

Wells, S. D. (2023, January 7). GASLIGHTING: Same FDA that threatened doctors with prosecution over Ivermectin use now claims they never opposed it. NaturalNews. https://www.naturalnews.com/2023-01-07-fda-claims-never-opposed-ivermectin.html

MATERIALIST OPPOSITION – EPISTEMOLOGY IN CRISIS PART 4

previous articles in series:
https://24K.cc/article/epistemologycrisis1/
https://24K.cc/article/epistemologycrisis2/
https://24K.cc/article/epistemologycrisis3/

“What is sure about me, I am not a Marxist.”
– Karl Marx

“For the first time in its history, Western Civilization is in danger of being destroyed internally by a corrupt, criminal ruling cabal which is centered around the Rockefeller interests, which include elements from the Morgan, Brown, Rothschild, Du Pont, Harriman, Kuhn-Loeb, and other groupings as well. This junta took control of the political, financial, and cultural life of America in the first two decades of the twentieth century.”
– Carroll Quigley (favourite teacher of Bill Clinton)

“You are a den of vipers. I intend to rout you out and by the Eternal God I will rout you out. If the people only understood the rank injustice of our money and banking system, there would be a revolution before morning.”
– Andrew Jackson, as he proceeded to close the second national bank of the US.

Image is a slave to the idea as material is slave to Spirit. This means that if Spirit is important, the material must be held to the highest expectations possible. What is represented by a corporation? What is the Spirit that underlies a corporation other than the people who work there? Why do they get no say in the direction these fictional entities take?

EVIL ORGANISATION

Corporations are an inherently evil method of organisation (Roe 2023). This makes sense historically since the model of corporations today began as the structure of colonialism. The existence of the corporate fictional identity in contrast to the represented grouping of actual people form a unique human social dynamic that generationally liquidates any other identities. It is by design, colonial and oppressive. This is due to the manipulation of natural functions of generational lifestyle adaptations in human populations (Roe 2024a). These are typically the present identities based in cultures that naturally evolve and persist in healthy human society. Inflationary central bankers and their corporate minions determine the direction of culture by pilfering from everyone. They can be expected to take over the media with a cultural agenda of conformation to their needs. They manage differences between people within the population to stop organisation against themselves. Amazon’s Whole Foods chain has been caught redhanded admitting to this in internal communications (Peterson 2020). Instead of fighting the corporations, the labour unions are stuck managing the more detached workforce, the harder work of organising forced upon them by corporatist machinations (Ferguson 2016).

These are all the same basic practices of the British imperialism and colonialism as inspired by the Romans. The Romans themselves engaged in religious wars which would culturally ‘tenderise’ entire groups with ecumenical propaganda so they could be more easily conquered later. This pattern is well-established throughout history. After conquering a land, it was common practice for empires to move portions of the population to other lands and then move strangers into those people’s homes. The USSR, British Empire, Ottomans, Holy Roman Empire, Romans, Persians, Egyptians, and now this modern invisible corporatist empire share this in common. They all move people around like pawns to weaken them, and destroy any other sources of power.

EMPIRE HIDDEN IN PLAIN SIGHT

Billionaire-level wealth never occurred of singular efforts alone, of course, everybody knows this but, further, they never occur anymore without approval from the trillionaires. It could be argued that this basic arrangement has always been the case throughout history. There was a time when billionaires were called kings and the trillionaires were simply the emperors. So they can still be referred to as such.

The trillionaire emperors have an insane amount of power, through control of billionaire monarchies. The emperors centralise industries into feudal courts and carefully select these monarchs, i.e. managers. Vassal princeps can lose everything if they do not operate by the rules of the emperors. So corporatism can be reasonably described as a satanic empire acting against people. These possessive corporations are contravening natural and spiritual selection.

Each “individual” corporate body is actually a lot like a demonic possession. The fictional identity forces the body of the organisation to act in ways never volunteered by the overwhelming majority of represented individuals. The demon possessing an organisation is centrally manipulated by the largest corporate conglomerates playing the role of the ‘Satan,’ from the Hebrew for ‘great enemy of God.’ In this case, corporatism and its agents are the great enemies of humanity and our natural destiny.

CULTURAL REGRESSION

Whole generations have been trained to support cultural regression. This regression has been designed to fit corporate profit, not health and best wellness needs, the needs that matter. An employee’s life is only as valuable as they are to the corporate bottom-line. This includes dictation of religious development through corporatist funding and special loan programs to churches.

Their solutions and fixes amount to simple destruction. This is what degradation looks like. They make matters worse by promoting mental disorders to spiritually-broken people (Roe 2024b). This has been done through various forms of media over the last few decades now. However, it is blatantly obvious that this is a corporate project of encouraging dysfunction in society. There is nothing natural about castrating mentally ill children and calling it a “movement,” least of all its corporate-funded formation. People so fooled lose all other identities but the deconstructive one. All this “movement” has actually accomplished is the dispossession of women from their role and power in society, and further divided the labour pool.

FALSE UTOPIA

Many are led to believe a corporate Utopia of maximum efficiency will naturally resolve. This happens if enough people forget their diverse cultures and become automatons to a common corporate dead non-culture. They have created the most current version of this script in close coordination with artificial intelligence tools. Fortunately, they work with flawed data.

Hubristically they cut themselves off with the attempt to encapsulate the Universe inside a simple paradigm for pertinent data, as determined by flawed humans with limited insight. They think they are being innovators or breaking the mould. In fact, they confirm the mould of corporatism, identical to a purified evil imperialism operated on stolen money, as it is. This novel form of material imperialism engages in all the same manipulation of past empires. The goal is to make people more malleable to international interests, and less connected to their own.

DECULTURATION

The goal of corporatism is conformation of everything to itself, the stockholders; corporatism values the maximisation of profit over all. This amounts to neutralisation of any efforts or goals incoherent with the overriding bottomline. This is as should be expected naturally of any overpowered fictional organisations. This must entail compromising any other means of organisation or mutuality on the parts of the workers.

Corporatism is neo-colonialism in which invested corporate power is sovereign and guaranteed by the emperor. The British Emperors, however, dared not even use the title, in deference to the Colonial corporate powers. These corporations were experts at deculturation, having literally created it. The point of the original corporations within colonialism was to manage the population, the natives and colonials (Roe 2024c). In India, for instance, the British Empire would exterminate entire religions and groups of people, for the benefit of corporate profit, which was as good as serving the empire itself.

To this end, the corporations naturally promote a plurality of identities safe for themselves alternative to whatever might be primary to the region, most especially among their labour pool. The corporations lobby more effectively when any worker commonality is destroyed. Worker cooperation competes with corporate control, and that cannot be allowed. The more alienated the populace becomes from itself, the more profitable and easier to control they are for demoralising corporatism. This is to say that disempowering the populace allows them to get away with more crime.

CORPORATE TERROR

The anti-nativist tendencies of these extractive corporations are even more pronounced after decades of funding genocidal political ideologies and terroristic entities on all sides. This is because those ideologies become self-perpetuating. When the proceeding generations of corporate-grown genocidal ideologies then come to dominate the corporations themselves, corporatism takes on its final purely evil form, genocidal imperialism. Corporations bankrolled the genocides and cultural destruction committed upon the Chinese populace. What has the cruel deculturation of China done besides stultify the Chinese Spirit and force those people into an abject slavery to international corporatism?

DIRECTION

I contend that most of the deepest divides that occur between honest and legitimate scientists originate with corporate malfeasance. Many well-meaning scientists trust illegitimate scientists whose careers are trained to corporate interests. None are aware of this, perceiving their educational direction as natural rather than due to monied influence, which is to say corporatist, creating multiple avenues of anti-nativist pressure throughout the culture (Roe 2023).

ANTI-MAJORITIES

Meanwhile whole areas of research lay dormant due to the anti-majority political ideologies that have been forced into power over academia by corporatism. In the USA, this is done through multi-billion dollar corporate tax-haven foundations and publishers. The areas of research the bankrollers forbid should clarify intentions perfectly. Corporate entities bankroll anti-majority propaganda, which is most often anti-nativist, wherever they are. Marx was a strong advocate for the destruction of all traditional cultures. These corporate forces never stopped, they just brought it home through Marx’s ideology. While Marx himself may have been complimentary of certain Western cultures, his followers obviously were not.

This anti-majority agenda has killed whole fields of research deemed “inappropriate,” as though society were filled with children needing to be redirected. Marx claimed to have proposed “Critical Theory” for the improvement of mankind by ending “capitalist” oppression from every sector. However all it has done is led to more oppression, under the same emperors as then. The fraud perpetrated by Marxist “Critical Theorists” is a revitalised version of an ancient strategy to destroy the history of people in order to destroy the people, called cultural genocide (Paludan-Müller 2022). This is a common strategy used in war, for the eradication of people.

DAMNATIO

The astounding career of Laurence Waddell and his theories are waved away without any explanations, other than being considered “racist” in outcome because they contradict the opinions of powerful interests (Moshenska 2010). Waddell was an exceptionally gifted scientist wholly devoted to his craft. He deserves far greater respect than he is given. His opinions and scholarship were considered impeccable while publishing findings of the long lost ancient sites he discovered. However, based upon certain of his conclusions, he is now completely ignored for political expedience. Is this because there was too much truth to be learned from his writings?

FEELINGS VERSUS SURVIVAL

An example of this is the fact that biological and physical anthropology are forbidden as “racist,” with little more than historical whining about past grievances and hurt feelings (Blakey 2021) that have absolutely nothing to do with the science or its legitimate value. Is our history worth learning and preserving? Feelings and emotions are not supposed to be part of this. This is harm to science, and harm to the preservation of our history and culture. It is plainly propaganda to do harm to the science and culture, but why is it done? Is a war being fought by these corporatist entities against the first industrialised nations? What is wrong with coming to conclusions that make some people uncomfortable or investigating ancestors in a phylogenic manner the way it is done with all other lifeforms?

For instance, homo Floresiensis was phylogenically connected to homo Habilis using physical anthropological methods (Argue 2017). It is acceptable to do it in hominids but not in more recent human ancestors? Why do people feel this way about simple data? This is not logical. Of course, anyone convinced by Waddell’s theories is simply misled because of an alignment with Waddell’s supposed bad character or ill intentions. Corporatist-aligned political opinions make a person better at scientific review, somehow (Moshenska 2010).

Interestingly, the same power-hungry colonialist corporatism that originally funded the first efforts in anthropology now fund propaganda and efforts against physical anthropology to the point of it being a practically dead science. The only reason for this is destruction of any basis for worker organisation outside the artificial constructs of corporatism. They want to erase common identity. It is an unannounced war against the peasants of the technocratic corporatist-controlled nations. Everyone so brainwashed is a pawn in it. It already destroyed so much of Chinese, Eastern European, and Asian cultures. Once this anti-majority corporatist engine of critique finishes its rampage throughout the West, Muslim nations, and Japan, it will continue on the same path everywhere, until no cultures are left. Who will survive when the corporatist agents pit starving masses against one another? What part of this is civilised?

MARX – THE CON ARTIST

Marx’s theories were put to corporatist use in USSR and China to legitimise cultural and physical genocides. Marx was a paid agent and cousin of the corporatist-banker, Lionel de Rothschild (Gelles 2021). Another of Marx’s cousins and friends was Heinrich Heine, who was a close friend of another important Rothschild family member. Heinrich famously bragged that Lionel was “the King of England and Ireland” (Knapp 1999), which was to say Emperor. Did Marx actually risk his cousins’ own “capitalism” with his plan to destroy traditional culture? Would they have suffered him to live or keep the money if they believed that? Or were these nothing more than imperialist bluffs in prelude to genocide and deculturation?

As brother-in-law to the spymaster of the Prussia, Marx was deeply imbedded in the corporatist state whose dismantling he claimed to desire. To wit, the “workers of the world unite” credo is a reversal of Marx’s actual intent of harming the nascent worker’s movements of the time. What more value could he have offered his benefactor cousins than redirecting worker anger to bring about the ultimate corporatist dream of totally centralised economic domination? And in the meantime, it could create profitable wars for corporatist bankers and topple governments in order to force changes.

SPITEFUL MARX

Marx advocated for the deculturation of Asia and India away from their “old Asiatic” ways. Marx’s spiteful desire for China was fulfilled by Mao’s Culture Revolution. Mao’s support from the corporatists confirms this, despite the active efforts to delegitimise this knowledge in the West as a “conspiracy theory” (Gardáš 2021). Marx was an agent of corporatism, sowing a malleable ideology to replace anti-corporatist perspectives. What was going to unite the workers? His book? Criticism? Yes, at least that is what he claimed.

Hegel would be appalled.

The quote at the beginning of this article was the truth coming out in jest. Marx was not a Marxist, but he was a duplicitous corporatist imperialist and unapologetically pompous elitist. All of his theories should be expelled as the corporatist distortions of proper Hegelian theory they are. Hegel would be appalled by the evils Marxism and corporatism have wrought upon the World.

COMMONALITIES

Low economic status is the least similar of any commonality, it is a negative attribute, the lack of something. Immediate criticism of anything traditional is also a negative attribute, the disinterest toward ideas. Across the board, secularisation and critique have been the themes all academics are required to apply if they expect to be taken seriously.

Culture of the West has been treated as non-existent and unnecessary at best. All this critique has done is stripped the industrialised nations of cultural vibrancy (Gutmann 2010). Corporate media then mocks the culture incessantly for being bland or stupid. Not only is this mockery promoted as acceptable in society but encouraged (Hughes 2015). This is so cruel. It has escalated to the point of identity deprivation in youth, where they seek new dangerous identities (Gutmann 2010; Yusoufzai 2017) or generate artificial identities based upon selfish and demeaning sexual practices (Eberstadt 2019; Sigusch 2004). The investment in Marx has paid off many times over by now.

“Corporatism is colonialism eating itself, consuming its own boundaries in order to enslave the World.”

UNDENIABLE ALIGNMENTS

Marx’s plans for a massive centralised international government perfectly serves the interests of these corporatist emperors. Surely serendipity found them and it was merely coincidence their goals aligned so well. Nearly 200 years later, the World Economic Forum (WEF) is a tiny well-funded orchestration arm for a project of World strangulation through corporatist entities and their controlled governments. This implementation is oddly similar to Marx’s original plan, except managed through corporations. This is to be accomplished not by workers but through machinations of corporatist agents who just happen to be relatives of the emperors, like Marx.

So then the Marxist project of deculturation and “Critical Theory,” is actually imperialist corporate propaganda that is explicitly genocidal in outcome and origins. The point of the entire project is destroying any basis for organisation for workers. However the deculturation of people is the preparation for replacement. In no uncertain terms, this is identical to the actions of past empires as they prepared for genocide.

SUMMARY

Corporatist funded educational institutions do not train people to be unbiased, but dishonestly self-deculturating. What good has the spread of Marxism done if the World is more dominated by monied interests than ever? If Marxist-aligned activists truly desired to fight tyranny, they would attack billionaires, instead of receiving paycheques from such organisations to riot and disrupt elections (Pomper 2022).

These same corporate super-structures fund academia throughout the West. That simple fact alone should give everybody pause. These corporations were built upon the backs of the same people they now aggressively pursue in degrading every facet of being. The corporations disrupt free speech, with any conveniently available excuse, as they demonise the good, glorify evil, and create disorder. The point is to leave the people powerless and beholden to the corporations.

Corporatism is the overgrowth of colonial corporate power in a retro-colonisation, which is silencing of the original critics and possibly the only people that could have stopped it. Corporatism is colonialism eating itself, consuming its own boundaries in order to enslave the World. Anyone that resists must be destroyed. However, these evil corporations will be known for what they are, that is through actions. People must wake up.

REFERENCES

Argue, D., Groves, C. P., Lee, M. S. Y., & Jungers, W. L. (2017). The affinities of Homo floresiensis based on phylogenetic analyses of cranial, dental, and postcranial characters. Journal of Human Evolution, 107, 107–133. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2017.02.006

Blakey, M. L. (2021). Understanding racism in physical (biological) anthropology. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 175(2), 316–325. doi:10.1002/ajpa.24208

Eberstadt, M. (2019). Primal Screams: How the Sexual Revolution Created Identity Politics (First edition). Templeton Press.

Ferguson, J.-P. (2016). Racial Diversity and Union Organizing in the United States, 1999–2008. ILR Review, 69(1), 53–83. doi:10.1177/0019793915602253

Gardáš, D. (2021). The Rothschilds and the PRC: Banking, Financial and Other Interactions between the Red Shield Dynasty and the Red China Masaryk University, Faculty of Arts – Dissertation. https://is.muni.cz/th/mscxq/?lang=en

Gelles, E. (2021). The Jewish Journey: A Passage through European History. https://www.bloomsbury.com/us/jewish-journey-9781350241701/

Gutmann, D. (2010, November 1). Deculturation and Its Discontents. The American Interest. https://www.the-american-interest.com/2010/11/01/deculturation-and-its-discontents/

Hughes, J. (2015, February 6). How Many White People Does It Take to Ruin a Good Joke? The New Republic. https://newrepublic.com/article/120916/white-people-are-co-opting-black-peoples-jokes-about-white-people

Knapp, L. (1999). Dostoevsky’s ‘The Idiot’: A Critical Companion. https://nupress.northwestern.edu/9780810115330/dostoevskys-the-idiot

Moshenska, G. (2010). ‘At Variance With Both General and Expert Opinion’: The Later Works of Lieutenant-Colonel Professor Laurence Austine Waddell. Bulletin of the History of Archaeology, 20(1), Article 1. doi:10.5334/bha.20106

Paludan-Müller, C. (2022). The Geopolitical Context of Cultural Heritage Destruction. In C. Finkelstein, D. Gillman, & F. Rosén (Eds.), The Preservation of Art and Culture in Times of War (p. 0). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780197610565.003.0015

Peterson, H. (2020, April 25). Amazon-owned Whole Foods is quietly tracking its employees with a heat map tool that ranks which stores are most at risk of unionizing. Business Insider. http://archive.today/2020.04.21-061718/https://www.businessinsider.com/whole-foods-tracks-unionization-risk-with-heat-map-2020-1

Pomper, S. (2022). George Soros Pledges to Keep Funding Pro-Criminal, Anti-Police Prosecutors, National Police Association. National Police Association. https://nationalpolice.org/george-soros-pledges-to-keep-funding-pro-criminal-anti-police-prosecutors/

Roe, M. A. (2023). Corporations Promote Profitable Sins as Virtues series. 24K Journal of Virtues Science. Corporations Promote Profitable Sins as Virtues part 1 – Material Idealism | Corporations Promote Profitable Sins as Virtues part 2 – Delusions of Control

Roe, M. A. (2024a). Excess Teenage Rebellion and Inflation – Proposing Twin Theories of Generational Panic and Lifestyle Deterioration Signalling. 24K Journal of Virtues Science. To Be Published.

Roe, M. A. (2024b). Manteic Ontology and Theory of Mind series. 24K Journal of Virtues Science. To Be Published.

Roe, M. A. (2024c). Terminal Societal Cancer. 24K Journal of Virtues Science. To Be Published.

Sigusch, V. (2004). On cultural transformations of sexuality and gender in recent decades. German Medical Science : GMS e-Journal, 2, Doc07.

Yusoufzai, K., & Emmerling, F. (2017). How identity crisis, relative deprivation, personal characteristics, and empathy contribute to the engagement of Western individuals in Islamist terrorist behavior. Contemporary Voices: St Andrews Journal of International Relations, 8(1), Article 1. doi:10.15664/jtr.1292

LIBERAL SPIRIT REBORN – EPISTEMOLOGY IN CRISIS PART 5

“When a man does not know what harbour he is making for, no wind is the right wind.”
– Seneca

---

“Knowing yourself is the beginning of all wisdom.”
– Aristotle

---

“To find yourself, think for yourself.”
– Socrates

---

“The privilege of a lifetime is to become who you truly are.”
– Jung

---

“The ignorant man is not free, because what confronts him is an alien world, something outside him and in the offing, on which he depends, without his having made this foreign world for himself and therefore without being at home in it by himself as in something his own. The impulse of curiosity, the pressure for knowledge, from the lowest level up to the highest rung of philosophical insight arises only from the struggle to cancel this situation of unfreedom and to make the world one’s own in one’s ideas and thought.”
– Hegel

---

“Knowing others is intelligence; knowing yourself is true wisdom. Mastering others is power; mastering yourself is true strength.”
– Lao Tzu

---

The post-Plandemic liberal resurgence is to occur through a culturally-aware Spirit. Distributism serves as the economic engine of its ascendance, giving powers back into the hands of workers, individuals, and allowing communities to once again flourish in a sustainable manner. This is to be a liberalism for all times, liberalism of the Spirit that focuses upon the internal awakening in alignment with culture, the Artistic product of Spirit. Those spiritually awakened easily recognise the truth in the twinned goals of conservation and progress, Reason and Creation.

All corporations actively deculturate their workers. They are the same corporations as created under colonial powers. Lifeless husks, remnants of imperial powers that now serve no purpose but to assure our enslavement. The obvious solution is to replace them within each nation, and strangle them through eventual international minimisation.

POLITICS AND MONEY

Where there is nothing within the society for objective evaluations, introduced novelties are random and value cannot be reasonably determined. This is especially true with the introduction of systematic incompatibilities and the resultant randomised static. The deconstruction of evaluation is the underlying goal for most corporatist messaging, which allows for the import of unlimited novelty. Anybody evaluating novelties is castigated and scorned as evil by these singular-minded deculturised victims. This basic foundation is terrible enough in politics but it is a disaster of monumental proportions for the purposes of science.

DIFFICULTY

Contradicting a thought or idea is much more difficult than accepting or ignoring it. This can take a tremendous amount of courage and willpower. Every science should be directed by individuals capable of courage and willpower. Such individuals as capable of this courage and willpower are truly honest and in emotional control. People prove capable of true Reason by its expression through virtues.

VALUES

A scientist must be free and capable of assigning value. Without the ability to assign value, a scientist is just a servant to interests external to the self and self-interest. Such a servant is unable to determine importance and provide the focus necessary to properly innovate. Science becomes aimless without the guiding light of absolute Spirit, that is in Art, most importantly of culture, religion, and philosophy.

Perverse sciences result from practice of “pure” method and formula without meaning. Meaning for an individual is only derived through reflective self-development. False meaning is based in whatever trivialities over which the individual happens to obsess. This is often what they have been convinced is most important through propaganda. This is observable in the scientific community. Those obsessed in selfish identities tend to produce trivial science based upon current trends in propaganda, or wherever else the corporatist dollar directs.

This also explains why, in many countries, there are unhealthy people placed in positions responsible for determining what is healthy for others. Such are prone to the same faults of outsiderness alienation. There are no expectations in terms of virtues for any of the corporatist sciences.

PERSPECTIVE

In the case of an individual detecting some proteins using a scientific instrument, that is the finding. It cannot tell anything about what it is or what it was. Scientists go to accepted and “tested” theory to understand the dynamism of interaction. Without philosophy and theory, Creation along with Reason, there is no way of knowing what is causal or simply caused and correlative. Creation and Reason are reality, and so this makes sense.

It is encouraging for a scientist to have it all spelled out in a nice narrative, but the depth of theory is forever limited by the capability of imagination and grounding in reality. The presence of all pieces with a nice narrative connecting them together does not prove anything. All they suggest is that a pattern or correlation has been observed.

THE UNSEEN (OR YOUR BASIC INSTRUMENTS ARE FLAWED, DEAR MAN)

In spiritual and cultural terms, “reproducibility” is about as meaningful as saying something is reproducible. The Spirit behind culture is about what is not reproducible, the product of the efforts revelatory of the true self. There is no reproducibility in systems that are not rational to humanity, and no accounting of possibly false causative correlations in the parts of reality that are not observable. All that can be determined of what is within comes from observations of externalities, which is to say outcomes (Roe 2024b). Experimental design cannot account for unseen confounding factors. Human perception is based on what was necessary for ancestors to survive, not the known universe in absolute perfection.

Many theories are taken for granted, based upon faith. Primarily this is because the officially defined narratives appear to align with observations and there are not better explanations. All the correlative observations of a phenomenon could still be indicating an as yet missing causative force without actually causing one of the effects itself. Any of the effects could be a largely unrelated side-effect of whatever mechanisms are actually at play.

RECIPES

The modern epistemology has led to the proposition that science is like a recipe, with individual scientists as replaceable cogs. The thought is that anybody can be trained in the techniques and then perform whatever science. This is nonsense.

The idea that a person unreflective of the self could contribute to the understanding of the Universe is absurd on its face. Attempting to artificially remove bias only allows an excuse for the only bias left, money or material wealth. It is a false replication of enlightened self-dispossession. The problem is no science is possible without bias.

All ‘life science’ has Life bias, for example. It should anyway but should society achieve no bias in things, there would be no bias toward Life generally, and the result is inevitable death. Life deserves bias, as it is our origin. Replacing those interactions of our origin is fiddling with the divine. Transhumanism is evil.

TRANSHUMANISM == DEATH

Humanity is not to be saved from mortality by immortality, but damned by it. Make no mistakes, artificial immortality is the death of humanity. Those who move further away from Life, which is to say their origin, become detached. Those desperate to maintain their material attachment to this World are destined to harm Life, if given the opportunity to do so.

People disown their moral determination because they are trained from youth in public education as corporate citizens long before they are trained as scientists. They have given over their right to judge, as promoted in the sciences with relativism. Everything is relative, so that nothing is absolute or sincere and all things are open to debate, without any guiding Reason or moderation. This mindset might be sustainable at the present moment but in the longterm, with genetic engineering and transhumanism, people are going to have to make a decision which side of this argument they stand: that of biological conservatism or special extermination.

BAPTISM OF SCIENCE

The nature of the real World can only be accurately described by someone experienced in self-mastery and adept in culture. Science is not reality but the best current description of the observable nature. It is nonsensical to define a fictitious nature without us. Instead, true humanity is allowing the reality of nature in actuality to inform and define us within our knowledge, all science. This is the absolute expression of humanity but one must examine lived human life to accurately reflect upon it and describe it. This is not done by corporatist servants, but philosophers.

UNDENIABLE BY FORCE OF TRUTH

There are less virulent strains of corporatism, just as there are more beneficial elements of various socialist ideologies. However, in all cases, the trend toward benefit is identical in focus. The beneficial focus for Life-functional human beings is in empowerment and determination, identical with cooperative intentions. The goal of every healthy and wise human being should be relatively similar, so too there could only be one goal in the purposeful disruption of the spiritual process: corporatist destruction of humanity.

CASE FOR AUGUST RESEARCH

What is this modern obsession for newer references? The supposed purpose in requiring newer sources is to guarantee the freshest and most robust ideas. However, it rarely does this, and, for many sciences, has a tendency to do the exact opposite. In many sciences there are entire domains of investigation that continue to be ignored not because they proved of little value. This is partly due to being strangled by a lack of “up to date” references exploring the topics. Could this requirement be doing more harm than benefit? How can ignored topics be uncovered from older research if it is never read? This is exactly the point of requiring “up to date” sources.

GENETICS

Could it be that such a low threshold for significant correlation in genetic studies is a symptom of some underlying basic misconceptions about DNA and its proposed mechanical relationships to genetics and gene theory? With manipulation of the physical DNA, humanity enters a stage of self-ordained godhood. The problem here is that godhood presumes mastery of reality and humanity is only now beginning to understand DNA and genetics, or their relationships to reality, material, and consciousness. We have barely grasped reality and the nature of consciousness. We are supposed to believe that everything has been decided and we can hang up the towel? Lies.

The human consciousness can somehow just be encapsulated into data on a computer, according to popular science fiction (Roe 2023a). Is it true that if the human experience can be fundamentally changed by technology and genetic engineering, it should be so necessarily? This is flawed reasoning since the primary apparatus of mind has an intrinsic connection to the nature of reality that is perfectly unqualifiable by humans. This does not mean that we cannot know that it is there, it simply means that the strength and character is completely immanent. This means that it can only be known by the quality of the works that are produced by the mind so oriented.

GLOBAL LIBERALISM

A true global liberalism should be concerned with freedom of the maximum number of people. It is honouring culture and allying philosophies that contribute to complete freedom (Roe 2024a). Freedom comes from within mechanisms of universalisation in context of ones own lived culture. Philosophy must be encouraged. Spirituality and moderation must be encouraged. Cooperatives must be promoted.

Freedom requires special plans for every nation specific to their needs. Everything must be customised and tailored to optimally interact with their extant culture and legacies therein, which embody various traditions. These plans obviously could not include the mass importation of populations into other nations, where they are outsiders. Such actions would be aimed purely at fomenting chaos and war, which is the most anti-liberal, disruptive, and destructive thing for cultures, as well as being exceedingly imperialist.

RENAISSANCE

This is the call for a New Renaissance. It requires a truly philosophical liberalism founded upon the elevation of Spirit through humanity’s natural domain of activated culture in meritocratic cooperation (Roe 2023b). Preceding every successful revolt is also a shift economically, however, and so the plan requires an economic engine of revolution. Wise scholars created a system of economics that has already proven successful both practically and for the empowerment of workers. These successes include worker-owned cooperatives and credit unions.

DISTRIBUTISM

Distributism is simply a method of economic management in societies that replaces state and public corporations with individual units locally organised by the stakeholders (Roe 2024a). This is economic revolution that can be implemented now in coordination with standing communities. Cooperatives are strong, resilient, ideal for workers, and responsive to customers (Roe 2024a).

THE SPIRITUAL RESTORATION OF THINKERS

Bias toward the worst is a betrayal of the best, as it degenerates the natural order. The destruction of order is precisely what the corporations have been aiming to do, and so any compatible biases are immediately pro-corporation. This is the return of honesty. The problem is alienated critique, which only seeks to destroy its target for the sake of destruction. Only within as part of it can an idea change a particular, and only true universalising is Good, which is identical to societal health in fact.

RULES FOR BIAS

1. Bias is endemic, things are only knowable through the perspective of identity. Removal of bias is impossible in itself, as it is the attempt at removal of self or identity, artificial dispossession. Detriment implies malice and bad bias, regardless any lies. Identity is not something that can be replaced. Anybody who pretends otherwise has ulterior motives, most likely decultural, and therefore genocidal.
2. Honesty or dishonesty are the only potential options with bias. Ownership of bias is admittance to honesty. Attempting to disown bias is admittance to dishonesty. There is no middle-path in the matter here. Either a person is honestly biased or dishonestly “unbiased.”
3. Philosophers must own bias toward Life and wisdom. A scientist cannot contribute to science without being a philosopher and embodying a legacy, or selection of traditions. Bias toward Life can only occur through a particular, a society, or not at all.
4. “Unbiased” is not a valid term and implies materialism, as avarice is the lowest common denominator of biases.
5. Bias toward Life is bias toward wisdom, which is to say culture and Spirit.
6. Wisdom is bias toward the elements of self and society that allow wisdom.
7. All wisdom is representational and exists through initiation.
8. Therefore wisdom is based in reality with bias builtin.

Scientists who are not philosophers first are like the scientific tools at their disposal, the trappings without the soul. Philosophically, there must be an origination in order to find destination. Obfuscation of origination defeats the destination.

REFERENCES

Roe, M. A. (2023a). Corporations Promote Profitable Sins as Virtues series. 24K Journal of Virtues Science. Corporations Promote Profitable Sins as Virtues part 1 – Material Idealism | Corporations Promote Profitable Sins as Virtues part 2 – Delusions of Control

Roe, M. A. (2023b). Resurrexit Spiritus series. 24K Journal of Virtues Science. Resurrexit Spiritus: Spiritual Phenomenology, Evolution of Spirit, First Other Theory of Fatherhood Attachment, and Structural Virtues System

Roe, M. A. (2024a). Cooperate! series. 24K Journal of Virtues Science. To Be Published.

Roe, M. A. (2024b). Manteic Ontology and Theory of Mind series. 24K Journal of Virtues Science. To Be Published.

previous articles in series:
https://24K.cc/article/epistemologycrisis1/
https://24K.cc/article/epistemologycrisis2/
https://24K.cc/article/epistemologycrisis3/
https://24K.cc/article/epistemologycrisis4/